Due to the rapid developments and major challenges facing education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia—and the intense competition among educational institutions at the local, regional, and international levels—Tabuk University has, since its establishment, been committed to providing high-quality educational and research services. These services are tailored to labor market needs, contribute to the national economy, actively support development efforts, and promote a knowledge-based economy.
In its research activities, the University of Tabuk adopts strategies, policies, and procedures that aim to elevate the quality and distinction of scientific research, while emphasizing a strong commitment to ethical responsibility in the production, acquisition, preservation, transmission, development, and application of knowledge.
The “Regulations for Scientific Research Ethics” document is based on the university’s strategic vision: “An institution of excellence in education and research that contributes to community service.” This vision necessitates the existence of such an important document, which was developed following a comprehensive review of global literature, regulations, standards, and best practices related to research ethics and their core principles.
It is worth noting that all the rules listed in this document are in full alignment with the principles and values promoted by Islam. The ultimate goal of this document—and other similar codes of research ethics adopted by universities and research institutions—is to prevent ethical violations in research conduct, rather than simply serve as a list of punishments for offenders. Its greater purpose is to protect the integrity of the scientific research system from any unethical behavior that could damage the university's academic reputation—damage that could be difficult to overcome in the short term.
This highlights the importance of the “Scientific Research Ethics Regulations” document in raising awareness among all individuals involved in research about these ethical standards. Many instances of research misconduct are often the result of a lack of awareness or understanding of research ethics among some researchers, students, administrators, or even funding agencies. Research ethics literature clearly emphasizes that ethical behavior in research primarily stems from internal moral values and noble human principles such as honesty, integrity, and sincerity—not merely from formal rules and regulations. Therefore, leading global universities and research institutions rely heavily on the self-discipline and ethical commitment of everyone involved in the research process.
Additionally, the literature highlights the difficulty of detecting certain unethical behaviors in research from outside the research group or institution—especially in research outputs that are not subject to rigorous peer review, such as research conducted solely for promotion purposes. For this reason, prestigious universities strongly encourage their members to immediately report any ethical violations they observe within research groups or by individual members.
Finally, it is essential to emphasize that preserving the integrity and nobility of scientific research—in terms of producing knowledge, serving humanity, and building a knowledge-based society—can only be achieved if everyone in the research ecosystem (including researchers, students, technicians, and administrative staff) adheres to practices that are evaluated and monitored in a fair and transparent manner, and if they are confident they will not be penalized for upholding academic integrity.
This document, “Regulations for Scientific Research Ethics,” was created to elevate the standards of scientific research at the university and ensure its alignment with international benchmarks and best ethical practices. It provides a general framework of rules, behaviors, and procedures expected to be followed by anyone working with or affiliated with the university in the field of scientific research.
The words listed below—unless the context suggests otherwise—will hold the meanings described alongside them for this document:
5. Authors: Individuals listed in the scientific output and have, in one way or another contributed significantly towards scientific research. They are answerable and liable for the processes and outcomes of the research.
6. Academic freedom: The right of academics to address research and knowledge topics freely, in accordance with the globally recognized academic rules and norms.
7. Research integrity: Adherence to scientific ethical values and professional standards in conducting scientific research, ensuring the research process is carried out with reliability and accuracy.
8. Research misconduct: Engaging in acts such as fabricating data or results; falsifying or manipulating research procedures to obtain outcomes not supported by the research; committing plagiarism by stealing or misappropriating others’ ideas; improperly citing sources; recycling previously published research by oneself or others; omitting the names of actual research participants; adding names of individuals who did not participate in the research; or any other serious errors or violations.
9. Scientific research on humans: The regulated procedures conducted on humans for the purpose of collecting information and testing hypotheses for scientific purposes.
10. Scientific research on animals: The regulated procedures conducted on animals for the purpose of collecting information and testing hypotheses for scientific purposes.
11. Conflict of interest: Refers to situations in which a researcher may gain personal benefits from decisions or actions taken by virtue of their professional role or official position in research or a research project.
12. Copyrights: A form of legal protection that preserves the author’s rights when reproducing their intellectual/scientific work or producing a new original work.
13. Patent: A legal guarantee (local or international) that grants the patent holder the right to control, produce, use, or commercialize their invention.
14. Research risk: The potential harm that researchers, participants, subjects, and the surrounding environment may be exposed to during the conduct of the research.
15. Confidentiality: Not disclosing or passing on any data, information, or results related to research, scientific experiments, or researchers except to those authorized to disclose them.
16. Privacy: Preserving the specific conditions of participants in terms of customs, thinking, and what is required by tradition.
17. Electronic Publishing: The dissemination of some or all scientific material on the World Wide Web, either for a fee or free of charge.
The University of Tabuk seeks to achieve a number of objectives through these regulations, including:
All individuals involved in scientific research at the university shall adhere to the following values and practices:
Academic supervisor obligations
Student obligations
The general principles of intellectual property rights entail the following obligations:
This document outlines the following obligations to be observed when conducting human research:
When conducting experiments or research involving animals and plants, researchers must adhere to the following obligations:
(suggested: The use of endangered animals is prohibited unless explicitly permitted under applicable regulations and ethical guidelines.)
These rules shall be effective from the date of their adoption by the Scientific Council, and anything that conflicts with them shall be repealed.